Tank Girl is one of the few movies based on a comic book that I had not seen until now. I have been a fan of the genre for years, but I have to admit that I was skeptical about watching it because it is less mainstream than most of these kinds of films. I always love it when I am proven wrong about a film, and I am pleased to say that I loved almost every single second of this movie.
Tank Girl is the story of a girl who fights against an evil corporation who has control of Earths' water supply in a dystopian future. One of the things I love about this film is that it does not take itself too seriously. I mean, you have two women teaming up with an army of kangaroos!! Every character is so radically different than anything you have seen before, and this makes you cheer for them more than you typically would. The use of technology in the movie is also incredibly inventive, and the vehicles even look like they have built using parts of other vehicles. This film is incredibly entertaining, and it is also one of the more fascinating movies in the genre. However, I do have to address some problems I have with the movie. At the beginning of the film, we hear a bit of narration from Tank Girl (Lori Petty) that describes what is going on and what she is doing. I cannot emphasize enough how much I despise narration. There has to be some other way to bring exposition to a movie without it being told to me by the main character, thus taking me completely out of the film. Also, apparently one of the rules that the Water and Power Corporation is that no one can own animals. Not only is this rule not actually on the list of things you are not allowed to do in the world, but there is no explanation as to why this is a rule. Other than these minor issues, this is a crazy and wild film that will definitely leave a lasting impression.
Lori Petty plays Tank Girl. I have often talked about the fact that there is a severe lack of strong female characters in film. One of the other major reasons I loved this film is because of what Petty brings to the role. The character of Tank Girl epitomizes what a female action star should be. She kicks ass throughout the entire film, has a wonderful sense of humor and is defiant to the end. Petty shines in the role, and brings every ounce of craziness she has to an iconic performance.
Naomi Watts plays Jet Girl. "Jet", as she is called, is yet another example of a strong female character. She is a mechanic for the Water and Power corporation, but she switches sides when she realizes how horrible the people she works for actually are. She is also socially awkward, but really comes into her own at the climax of the film. Watts plays the character beautifully, right down to her physical movements. When Jet gets comfortable in her own skin at the final act of the movie, she talks and even moves differently than she does previously in the film. This is a great moment because she realizes her potential, and kicks ass in the process. Watts is quite good in the film, and displays a wide range of emotions throughout her characters' story arc.
Malcolm McDowell plays Kesslee. I like the way McDowell plays the character because it is a tad over the top which is exactly the way it should be considering the tone of the film. Thanks to his performance, the character of Kesslee is both odd and menacing. McDowell truly gives one of the quirkiest performances I have ever seen.
Rachel Talalay is the director of Tank Girl. First off, let me say that I love the fact that a woman directed this film. The character of Tank Girl is such an alluring character, and it takes a female director to fully realize the characteristics of the character. I love the world that Talalay created with this film. In this movie the Earth of the future is a desolate wasteland, and people have to create their own makeshift devices so that they can perform everyday functions. All of these devices have their own specific and unique look. The action sequences are exciting to watch, especially the sequence where Tank Girl hijacks the Water and Power shipment of weapons. There is also a musical number in the film where Tank Girl sings "Let's Do It". Lori Petty is particularly wonderful to watch in this sequence as it is both quirky and funny. There are also a couple of animated sequences that, even though they are not live-action, are extremely fun to watch. The only thing I did not care for was the use of the comic book source material in the movie. Sometimes there are frames from the comics that are used in the film to show what is happening instead of actual footage shot for the film. This took me completely out of the film. Other than that, Talalay does such a wonderful job of bringing the character of Tank Girl, and the world she inhabits, to life.
Tank Girl is one of the more unique comic book films, and even films in general, that I have ever seen. Everything about it has such an odd sensibility about it, and it is definitely not for everyone. If you are a fan of these kinds of films, and want to know more about the comic book movie genre before it got famous, then I recommend you pick this one up.
Sunday, May 21, 2017
Friday, May 19, 2017
Fathers And Sons: Part VI
If you choose to look at Star Wars as two separate trilogies, than Return of the Jedi is one of the rare instances where the third film in a film series wraps up everything perfectly. In fact, it is because of this that Jedi was my favorite of the original three films for a long time. This is one of the few third chapters in a series that actually makes me tear up every time I watch it.
Star Wars Episode VI: Return of the Jedi is the sixth installment in the Star Wars saga, and tells the story of Luke Skywalker attempting to turn his father, Darth Vader, back to the light side of the Force while the rebels attempt to destroy the second Death Star. One of the things you notice towards the beginning of the film is that Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill) has grown since the end of Empire. The duel with Vader at the end of that movie has changed him, and he has become wiser since then. He has even gotten a bit arrogant, just like his father was, in terms of being presumptuous about being a Jedi Knight and even using some powers of the dark side of the Force. We also see the character arcs of Boba Fett (Jeremy Bulloch) and Yoda (Frank Oz) come full circle. Speaking of Yoda, one of the last things he says is, "Do not underestimate the powers of the Emperor, or suffer your fathers' fate, you will." Now, let us go back to Empire when Luke asks Yoda if the dark side is stronger, to which Yoda quickly replies "No". It is my personal belief that the dark side IS stronger, but the reason Yoda says otherwise, and says so abruptly, is to prevent Luke from wanting to discover more about the power that the dark side offers. Later in the film, it is nice to see Lando Calrissian (Billy Dee Williams) pilot the Millennium Falcon since we learned that it was his ship before Han Solo (Harrison Ford) won it from him. I am also, apparently, one of the few defenders of the Ewoks. The Ewoks exist to show us that it does not matter how much technology you have. If the will of the people is strong, then they are always going to win. Also, for keen eyes of canon material, Captain Rex appears in the film!!! In the scene where Han Solo taps a stormtrooper on the shoulder and then the trooper chases after him, we see an older man at the front of the group of rebels that capture the trooper. That is Rex.
While Jedi may still be my personal favorite of the series, it does have its problems. I would have liked to see a scene where Luke Skywalker constructs his green lightsaber. No, a deleted scene does not count. I also would have liked to see Han and Lando reconcile after what happened in Empire. It feels like they start being friends again out of nowhere. Also, at one point in the film Han says to Luke, "Now I owe you one". Actually, he does not. Luke still owes him one more. Later in the film, the Emperor says that he cannot feel Lukes' presence. Why not? What exactly is preventing the Emperor from sensing Luke?? Later, towards the climax of the film, Admiral Piett (Kenneth Colley) says that he was given orders from the Emperor to keep the Imperial fleet in attack position. When did this happen??? Also, how does Luke know that Darth Vader will die if his mask is taken off?? It is not as if he has an extensive knowledge of the technology that runs Vaders' suit. Also, how does Luke know about the ancient Jedi ritual of a funeral pyre??? When did Obi-Wan teach him that???
Despite the inconsistencies, Jedi is my personal favorite of the Star Wars series. The character arcs are all wrapped up nicely, the battles are spectacular and the visual effects are second to none. This is a fitting conclusion to the Star Wars saga. Although, this is not really the end....
Joining the returning cast is Ian McDiarmid as The Emperor. The Emperor is deliciously evil in every scene, and is a show-stealing character. McDiarmid shines in the role, especially in the scenes where he is attempting to lure Luke to the dark side. The moment where he is killing Luke with the dark side lightning is especially frightening. This is an iconic role that is made even better because McDiarmid is a classically trained theater actor.
Richard Marquand is the director of Star Wars Episode VI: Return of the Jedi. There are certain revelations that happen in this film that Marquand handles quite well. The moments in the film where Obi-Wan Kenobi (Alec Guinness) reveals to Luke that Leia (Carrie Fisher) is his sister, and subsequently when Luke tells Leia this are drawn out so that the emotion can sink in. Also, the speeder bike chase is one of the most exhilarating sequences in the entire saga. The editing is quickly paced, and the P.O.V. shots make you feel like you are actually there. I also love that we see what the relationship between the Emperor and Darth Vader is like. There is a moment where Vader disobeys his master, and the scolding Vader receives is akin to that which a child would receive. Also, the last twenty-five minutes of the film are edited to perfection. There are three separate battles occurring: the ground battle on Endor, the space battle and the duel between Vader and Luke in the Emperors' throne room. Each battle gets an equal share of screen time, and each is so thrilling to watch that you cannot wait to see what happens next. The climax of the film, where Vader and Luke have a private moment together, has quite the emotional impact. Anakin Skywalker is redeemed by his son only to die in his arms moments later. This moment is handled with care by Marquand, and completes the story arc for Anakin in a beautiful way. It is because of all of these moments and more that Marquand does a fantastic job with this installment of Star Wars.
Return of the Jedi is, for the moment anyway, my favorite Star Wars film. Trilogies rarely end on a high note, but this film is an extraordinary exception. If you have the chance, I highly recommend that you re-visit Jedi and, if you have not seen it, do yourself a favor and watch it.
Star Wars Episode VI: Return of the Jedi is the sixth installment in the Star Wars saga, and tells the story of Luke Skywalker attempting to turn his father, Darth Vader, back to the light side of the Force while the rebels attempt to destroy the second Death Star. One of the things you notice towards the beginning of the film is that Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill) has grown since the end of Empire. The duel with Vader at the end of that movie has changed him, and he has become wiser since then. He has even gotten a bit arrogant, just like his father was, in terms of being presumptuous about being a Jedi Knight and even using some powers of the dark side of the Force. We also see the character arcs of Boba Fett (Jeremy Bulloch) and Yoda (Frank Oz) come full circle. Speaking of Yoda, one of the last things he says is, "Do not underestimate the powers of the Emperor, or suffer your fathers' fate, you will." Now, let us go back to Empire when Luke asks Yoda if the dark side is stronger, to which Yoda quickly replies "No". It is my personal belief that the dark side IS stronger, but the reason Yoda says otherwise, and says so abruptly, is to prevent Luke from wanting to discover more about the power that the dark side offers. Later in the film, it is nice to see Lando Calrissian (Billy Dee Williams) pilot the Millennium Falcon since we learned that it was his ship before Han Solo (Harrison Ford) won it from him. I am also, apparently, one of the few defenders of the Ewoks. The Ewoks exist to show us that it does not matter how much technology you have. If the will of the people is strong, then they are always going to win. Also, for keen eyes of canon material, Captain Rex appears in the film!!! In the scene where Han Solo taps a stormtrooper on the shoulder and then the trooper chases after him, we see an older man at the front of the group of rebels that capture the trooper. That is Rex.
While Jedi may still be my personal favorite of the series, it does have its problems. I would have liked to see a scene where Luke Skywalker constructs his green lightsaber. No, a deleted scene does not count. I also would have liked to see Han and Lando reconcile after what happened in Empire. It feels like they start being friends again out of nowhere. Also, at one point in the film Han says to Luke, "Now I owe you one". Actually, he does not. Luke still owes him one more. Later in the film, the Emperor says that he cannot feel Lukes' presence. Why not? What exactly is preventing the Emperor from sensing Luke?? Later, towards the climax of the film, Admiral Piett (Kenneth Colley) says that he was given orders from the Emperor to keep the Imperial fleet in attack position. When did this happen??? Also, how does Luke know that Darth Vader will die if his mask is taken off?? It is not as if he has an extensive knowledge of the technology that runs Vaders' suit. Also, how does Luke know about the ancient Jedi ritual of a funeral pyre??? When did Obi-Wan teach him that???
Despite the inconsistencies, Jedi is my personal favorite of the Star Wars series. The character arcs are all wrapped up nicely, the battles are spectacular and the visual effects are second to none. This is a fitting conclusion to the Star Wars saga. Although, this is not really the end....
Joining the returning cast is Ian McDiarmid as The Emperor. The Emperor is deliciously evil in every scene, and is a show-stealing character. McDiarmid shines in the role, especially in the scenes where he is attempting to lure Luke to the dark side. The moment where he is killing Luke with the dark side lightning is especially frightening. This is an iconic role that is made even better because McDiarmid is a classically trained theater actor.
Richard Marquand is the director of Star Wars Episode VI: Return of the Jedi. There are certain revelations that happen in this film that Marquand handles quite well. The moments in the film where Obi-Wan Kenobi (Alec Guinness) reveals to Luke that Leia (Carrie Fisher) is his sister, and subsequently when Luke tells Leia this are drawn out so that the emotion can sink in. Also, the speeder bike chase is one of the most exhilarating sequences in the entire saga. The editing is quickly paced, and the P.O.V. shots make you feel like you are actually there. I also love that we see what the relationship between the Emperor and Darth Vader is like. There is a moment where Vader disobeys his master, and the scolding Vader receives is akin to that which a child would receive. Also, the last twenty-five minutes of the film are edited to perfection. There are three separate battles occurring: the ground battle on Endor, the space battle and the duel between Vader and Luke in the Emperors' throne room. Each battle gets an equal share of screen time, and each is so thrilling to watch that you cannot wait to see what happens next. The climax of the film, where Vader and Luke have a private moment together, has quite the emotional impact. Anakin Skywalker is redeemed by his son only to die in his arms moments later. This moment is handled with care by Marquand, and completes the story arc for Anakin in a beautiful way. It is because of all of these moments and more that Marquand does a fantastic job with this installment of Star Wars.
Return of the Jedi is, for the moment anyway, my favorite Star Wars film. Trilogies rarely end on a high note, but this film is an extraordinary exception. If you have the chance, I highly recommend that you re-visit Jedi and, if you have not seen it, do yourself a favor and watch it.
Saturday, May 6, 2017
Keeping Up With The Doctor: Part 2
Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark is the quintessential adventure film of our time. This film birthed one of the greatest characters in the history of cinema, and has become one of American cinemas' greatest classics. It is one of those rare pieces of cinema that you never get tired of watching no matter how many times you have seen it.
Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark is, chronologically speaking, the second film in the Indiana Jones film series, and follows famous archaeologist Indiana Jones as he is hired by the U.S. government to acquire the Ark of the Covenant before the Nazis get to it. Right from the beginning, as all great films do, we understand who Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) is, and what he does. It is also understood that Jones has competitors within his line of work. This makes this, and the other films, so much more compelling because it adds conflict to the story. If Indy was the only one going on these kinds of quests, the film would feel extremely mundane. I also enjoy the time period in which the film is set. More specifically, I love that the antagonist in the film is a group of people rather than one person. The Nazi Party was the most evil group of people to ever grace the planet, and making Indiana Jones the protagonist automatically sets him up as an American hero. It also helps that one of his competitors, Rene Belloq (Paul Freeman), is actually working with Nazis because this makes you hate Belloq even more than you would if he was just competing with Indy. Raiders has some of the best action sequences ever filmed and has wonderful characters like Marion Ravenwood (Karen Allen) and Sallah (John Rhys-Davies). This is definitely a film that belongs on your "100 Movies To See Before You Die" list. Sadly though, even Steven Spielberg makes mistakes, and there are a few problems with the film. Firstly, at the end of the action sequence at the beginning of the film, we see Indy escape in a plane with Jock (Fred Sorenson). My question is: how were the men that Indy was with going to get away if Indy hadn't found out they were there to betray him? Were they just going to hang on the outside of the plane?? Also, I personally feel that it is confusing who Abner is. I know that it is common knowledge that he was Marions' father, but they talk about him like he was her lover. Later on, during the sequence where Marion is being kidnapped in the basket, there is a shootout at the end of the sequence. Now, obviously they use blank cartridges in these films, and someone usually cues the actors on when they need to react to getting shot. My problem with this sequence is that, when the driver of the truck gets shot, if you look carefully you can actually see someone in the back seat hit the driver on the head as a cue for the driver to fall over dead!!! You would think that a director like Spielberg would be able to frame the shot better so that we do not see this!!! Also, in that same sequence, it looks as if the truck explodes in a completely different area of the town than it is in the previous shot. I am shocked and disappointed that a movie as excellent as this has such a glaring continuity error. I also would have preferred to see more backstory about Indy and Sallahs' friendship. I feel as though it is a tad forced. Also, how the blazes did Indy get the gasoline pump down into the Well of the Souls so that he could set the snakes on fire??? Fill up those plot holes, Spielberg!!! Even with its' problems, Raiders is one of the most entertaining movies of the past thirty years, and serves as the introduction to one of cinemas' greatest heroes.
Harrison Ford plays Indiana Jones. Ford brings a certain gravitas to the role, and plays Indy with determination and fearlessness. This makes you cheer for the character even more because he knows the Nazis are evil, and he will stop at nothing to prevent them from achieving their goal. The scenes where we see him as "Professor Henry Jones Jr." are quite good as well because we see what Indy does in his professional life, and the dialogue rolls of Fords' tongue with such ease. These scenes add credibility to the character, and make you believe that he knows what he is getting himself into. This is an iconic role that cemented Fords' legacy as one of the biggest movie stars of all time.
Steven Spielberg is the director of Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark. Visually speaking, Spielberg does a masterful job of introducing and setting up the character of Indiana Jones within the first few minutes of the film. Even though we do not see Jones' face until about three minutes into the film, we understand who he is and what he does. I also love that the opening sequence that shows Indy as the adventurer is followed by the sequence that shows him as a professor. The mirroring of these sequences shows the different aspects of Jones' life and the multiple characteristics of the character. The scene with Indy in the map room is also spectacular to witness. The slow cuts help build visual tension, and the moment the sunlight hits the place on the map where the ark is hidden is one of the greatest moments in film history. Spielberg does this again later in the scene in the Well of the Souls. Much like the bug tunnel and spike room in The Temple of Doom, this sequence is exhilarating and tense at the same time. The shot of Indy landing in front of the cobra is another one of those movie moments that will last forever. The truck chase sequence is yet another one of these iconic moments. While this sequence is certainly one of the great action sequences of all time, it also displays Indys' determination to stop the Nazis from opening the ark. The stunt work in this sequence is absolutely breathtaking. This is undoubtedly one of Spielbergs' best films.
Raiders is a prime example of what every adventure film should be. It has a great story, great characters and some of the most iconic moments in cinema history. If you have not seen Raiders, and there should not be any reason why you have not, stop what you are doing right now, do yourself a favor and treat yourself to it. You will not regret it in the slightest.
Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark is, chronologically speaking, the second film in the Indiana Jones film series, and follows famous archaeologist Indiana Jones as he is hired by the U.S. government to acquire the Ark of the Covenant before the Nazis get to it. Right from the beginning, as all great films do, we understand who Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) is, and what he does. It is also understood that Jones has competitors within his line of work. This makes this, and the other films, so much more compelling because it adds conflict to the story. If Indy was the only one going on these kinds of quests, the film would feel extremely mundane. I also enjoy the time period in which the film is set. More specifically, I love that the antagonist in the film is a group of people rather than one person. The Nazi Party was the most evil group of people to ever grace the planet, and making Indiana Jones the protagonist automatically sets him up as an American hero. It also helps that one of his competitors, Rene Belloq (Paul Freeman), is actually working with Nazis because this makes you hate Belloq even more than you would if he was just competing with Indy. Raiders has some of the best action sequences ever filmed and has wonderful characters like Marion Ravenwood (Karen Allen) and Sallah (John Rhys-Davies). This is definitely a film that belongs on your "100 Movies To See Before You Die" list. Sadly though, even Steven Spielberg makes mistakes, and there are a few problems with the film. Firstly, at the end of the action sequence at the beginning of the film, we see Indy escape in a plane with Jock (Fred Sorenson). My question is: how were the men that Indy was with going to get away if Indy hadn't found out they were there to betray him? Were they just going to hang on the outside of the plane?? Also, I personally feel that it is confusing who Abner is. I know that it is common knowledge that he was Marions' father, but they talk about him like he was her lover. Later on, during the sequence where Marion is being kidnapped in the basket, there is a shootout at the end of the sequence. Now, obviously they use blank cartridges in these films, and someone usually cues the actors on when they need to react to getting shot. My problem with this sequence is that, when the driver of the truck gets shot, if you look carefully you can actually see someone in the back seat hit the driver on the head as a cue for the driver to fall over dead!!! You would think that a director like Spielberg would be able to frame the shot better so that we do not see this!!! Also, in that same sequence, it looks as if the truck explodes in a completely different area of the town than it is in the previous shot. I am shocked and disappointed that a movie as excellent as this has such a glaring continuity error. I also would have preferred to see more backstory about Indy and Sallahs' friendship. I feel as though it is a tad forced. Also, how the blazes did Indy get the gasoline pump down into the Well of the Souls so that he could set the snakes on fire??? Fill up those plot holes, Spielberg!!! Even with its' problems, Raiders is one of the most entertaining movies of the past thirty years, and serves as the introduction to one of cinemas' greatest heroes.
Harrison Ford plays Indiana Jones. Ford brings a certain gravitas to the role, and plays Indy with determination and fearlessness. This makes you cheer for the character even more because he knows the Nazis are evil, and he will stop at nothing to prevent them from achieving their goal. The scenes where we see him as "Professor Henry Jones Jr." are quite good as well because we see what Indy does in his professional life, and the dialogue rolls of Fords' tongue with such ease. These scenes add credibility to the character, and make you believe that he knows what he is getting himself into. This is an iconic role that cemented Fords' legacy as one of the biggest movie stars of all time.
Steven Spielberg is the director of Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark. Visually speaking, Spielberg does a masterful job of introducing and setting up the character of Indiana Jones within the first few minutes of the film. Even though we do not see Jones' face until about three minutes into the film, we understand who he is and what he does. I also love that the opening sequence that shows Indy as the adventurer is followed by the sequence that shows him as a professor. The mirroring of these sequences shows the different aspects of Jones' life and the multiple characteristics of the character. The scene with Indy in the map room is also spectacular to witness. The slow cuts help build visual tension, and the moment the sunlight hits the place on the map where the ark is hidden is one of the greatest moments in film history. Spielberg does this again later in the scene in the Well of the Souls. Much like the bug tunnel and spike room in The Temple of Doom, this sequence is exhilarating and tense at the same time. The shot of Indy landing in front of the cobra is another one of those movie moments that will last forever. The truck chase sequence is yet another one of these iconic moments. While this sequence is certainly one of the great action sequences of all time, it also displays Indys' determination to stop the Nazis from opening the ark. The stunt work in this sequence is absolutely breathtaking. This is undoubtedly one of Spielbergs' best films.
Raiders is a prime example of what every adventure film should be. It has a great story, great characters and some of the most iconic moments in cinema history. If you have not seen Raiders, and there should not be any reason why you have not, stop what you are doing right now, do yourself a favor and treat yourself to it. You will not regret it in the slightest.
Friday, April 28, 2017
Secret Agent Man: Part 2
From Russia with Love is one of the best James Bond films. In fact, it is more than just a great James Bond movie. It is a great spy movie with heroes and villains on both sides that are deceiving one another. When you combine all of this with one of the greatest henchman character portrayals in the history of the franchise, you get one of the most thrilling Bond films ever produced.
From Russia with Love is the second film in the James Bond franchise, and is the story of James Bond getting involved in an assassination plot in order for the British to get their hands on a Soviet LEKTOR encryption device. What makes this film so special is the complexity of the narrative. This is not your typical "Bond saves the world, and gets the girl" Bond film. You have to watch and listen carefully in order to know what is going on. Even when you think you know what is going on and what is going to happen, you actually have no idea. This was also the first Bond film to have the now-traditional opening title sequence. With such a rich narrative and great characters to boot, it is no wonder why From Russia with Love is a favorite among fans.
Sean Connery reprises his role as James Bond. In this film, we start to see certain characteristics that will be become the blueprint for the character. He is suave, he keeps his cool and the one-liners start to become commonplace. One of the other reasons I love this film is that we see Bond form friendships with his associates. Bond and Kerim Bay (Pedro Armendariz) form a mutual respect for one another, and the scenes with Connery and Armendariz are some of the best in the film.
Robert Shaw plays Grant. I absolutely love the fact that Grant does not say a word until the climax of the movie. There is a certain mystery and menace that is added to the character because of this. Shaw is thrilling to watch in the role, uttering his lines with coldness and malevolence. This is a terrifying performance if there ever was one.
Terence Young is the director of From Russia with Love. Most of the film takes place in Istanbul, and the sequences that showcase the city, especially the exterior shots, are remarkably beautiful. Most of the action sequences are at the end of the film and, while not over the top, are well done and serve the story quite well. It goes without saying that the fight scene between Bond and Grant on the train is one of the best ever filmed (although it is confusing which briefcase the tear gas is in). This scene has many cuts, which add tension and excitement, and Grant meets a fitting demise. Young grasps ahold of the essence of Bond with this film, and it is no wonder why his Bond films are some of the best.
From Russia with Love is one of my favorites of the Connery Bond films. It is so much more than your typical action flick. Raw emotion is evident in every scene, and as the film progresses you realize that the stakes have never been higher. If you are a Bond fan that needs to brush up on the history of the franchise, or if its simply been a while since you've seen this film, I highly recommend that you watch it.
From Russia with Love is the second film in the James Bond franchise, and is the story of James Bond getting involved in an assassination plot in order for the British to get their hands on a Soviet LEKTOR encryption device. What makes this film so special is the complexity of the narrative. This is not your typical "Bond saves the world, and gets the girl" Bond film. You have to watch and listen carefully in order to know what is going on. Even when you think you know what is going on and what is going to happen, you actually have no idea. This was also the first Bond film to have the now-traditional opening title sequence. With such a rich narrative and great characters to boot, it is no wonder why From Russia with Love is a favorite among fans.
Sean Connery reprises his role as James Bond. In this film, we start to see certain characteristics that will be become the blueprint for the character. He is suave, he keeps his cool and the one-liners start to become commonplace. One of the other reasons I love this film is that we see Bond form friendships with his associates. Bond and Kerim Bay (Pedro Armendariz) form a mutual respect for one another, and the scenes with Connery and Armendariz are some of the best in the film.
Robert Shaw plays Grant. I absolutely love the fact that Grant does not say a word until the climax of the movie. There is a certain mystery and menace that is added to the character because of this. Shaw is thrilling to watch in the role, uttering his lines with coldness and malevolence. This is a terrifying performance if there ever was one.
Terence Young is the director of From Russia with Love. Most of the film takes place in Istanbul, and the sequences that showcase the city, especially the exterior shots, are remarkably beautiful. Most of the action sequences are at the end of the film and, while not over the top, are well done and serve the story quite well. It goes without saying that the fight scene between Bond and Grant on the train is one of the best ever filmed (although it is confusing which briefcase the tear gas is in). This scene has many cuts, which add tension and excitement, and Grant meets a fitting demise. Young grasps ahold of the essence of Bond with this film, and it is no wonder why his Bond films are some of the best.
From Russia with Love is one of my favorites of the Connery Bond films. It is so much more than your typical action flick. Raw emotion is evident in every scene, and as the film progresses you realize that the stakes have never been higher. If you are a Bond fan that needs to brush up on the history of the franchise, or if its simply been a while since you've seen this film, I highly recommend that you watch it.
Monday, April 24, 2017
Fathers And Sons: Part V
Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back is one of the greatest sequels ever made, but it is also one of the greatest films ever made. This is ironic considering that when the film was originally released, film audiences did not perceive it that way. However, considering the excellent narrative and character development, it has now become a film that belongs on any number of "100 Films To See Before You Die" list.
Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back is the fifth installment of the Star Wars saga, and is the story of Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill) being trained as a Jedi Knight by Yoda (Frank Oz) while Han Solo (Harrison Ford) and Princess Leia (Carrie Fisher) are on the run from the Galactic Empire. This film is not only a great film, but it is a lesson in great storytelling. There is humor in the movie, but there are no gags. There is a love story, but rather than show makeout scenes and sex, Han and Leias' relationship is flirtatious and implied. I love how their relationship unfolds, too, because for a majority of the film, Han keeps Leia out of danger flying her throughout the galaxy. He does everything he can to keep her safe. They endure endless peril together, and fall in love. In the end, however, even Hans' willingness to take care of Leia is not enough, and the two characters are parted at a time when they need each other the most. Speaking of which, and I cannot emphasize this enough, nothing good happens to the protagonists in this film. At all. Yes, Han and Leia end up together, but only just before Han gets frozen in carbonite and taken to Jabba the Hutt by Boba Fett (Temuera Morrison). This film is quite depressing to experience but,because of the story and the way the relationships evolve between the characters, this film is a cinematic gem.
As masterful as this film is, there are a few story points and plot issues that I must address. Towards the beginning of the movie, Han Solo says that they ran into a bounty hunter on Ord Mantell that changed his mind on whether or not he was going to stay with the Rebellion. When exactly did this happen??? Also, after the evacuation of the rebel base on Hoth, Luke tells R2-D2 (Kenny Baker) that they are going to Dagobah instead of regrouping with Han and Leia. The problem is that he does not tell them. He just leaves without saying goodbye. Dick move, Skywalker. Also, how exactly does Dagobah feel familiar to Luke??? Also, how did Vader know Skywalkers' first name was Luke??? It is not as if he was present at his birth. That is like Lando inexplicably knowing Leia was a princess at the end of the movie. When did he find that out??? When they met, he did not even know her name! Another thing that bothers me about the film has to do with continuity. After, Han Solo hides the Millenium Falcon on the back of a Star Destroyer, Leia shuts down C-3PO (Anthony Daniels) because he will not stop talking. Yet, soon after it is revealed that they are being tracked by Boba Fett, he is inexplicably activated again even though nobody turned him back on. Even extremely good directors make errors.
Even with these problems, Empire is still regarded as the best of the original trilogy. I have always looked at this film as a character-driven drama more than a science-fiction film. The relationships between the characters are developed more, and the stakes are continuously raised throughout the film.
One of the newcomers to the returning cast is Billy Dee Williams as Lando Calrissian. What makes Lando so interesting and fun is the fact that you are not too sure about him when you first meet him. You get the feeling that, because he is friends with Han, he is a good guy, but the way he carries himself makes you feel uneasy. This just makes his betrayal all the more heartbreaking. It also makes his redemption that much more rewarding. When Lando realizes what he has done to his friends and goes back on his deal with Darth Vader, it is a heroic moment that will have you cheering. Williams shines in this role. He brings a beautiful balance of suaveness and swagger to the character. Also, when you are playing a character like this, it helps if you are good looking. Williams has dashing good looks which are only emphasized with that flowing cape of his.
In what is probably the most memorable role of the film, Frank Oz plays Yoda. I love the fact that Yoda is testing Luke during their initial meeting by acting goofy and weird. After which, Yoda concludes, "The boy has no patience" and the true Yoda is revealed. Also, the lessons that Yoda teaches Luke resonate deeply because they are lessons that every person should learn in life. It is also quite emotional to know that Yoda was present at Lukes' birth. Oz gives a powerful performance, and quite honestly has the best dialog in the film. The way Yoda moves and utters his lines are part of what makes you believe in the character. If this character had not worked, the whole film would have fallen apart.
Irvin Kershner is the director of Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back. This film is vast and broad, spanning two or three different worlds, and the sets are magnificent to look at. There are also some breathtaking space battles in the film. These scenes are spectacular to watch, but there is also emotion behind the effects because each battle puts our heroes in danger. There is never action for the sake of action. The cinematography in the Hoth battle is particularly beautiful. I also love what Kershner does with the friendship between Han and Luke in this film. Han Solo is not the warmest of men, but we see through a series of events that Han does care about Luke and vice-versa. These scenes are not overly emotional, but they still carry emotional weight. It would be remiss if I did not mention the climactic lightsaber duel between Darth Vader and Luke Skywalker. I love the fact that the duel takes place in three different "stages" if you will, and that each "stage" is considerably more intense than the previous one. The cinematography in the carbon freezing chamber alone will leave you awestruck. Of course, the reveal of Lukes' true parentage is one of the most bone-chilling moments in all of cinema. This is coupled by one of the best cliffhangers in all of cinema. I remember eight years ago when Irvin Kershner died, and I just happened to be watching Empire when I read the news that day. It broke my heart, and it still does, because he gave us the greatest film in the Star Wars saga.
It took me quite a while to appreciate The Empire Strikes Back as the cinematic landmark it truly is. I have always enjoyed the film, but only in recent years did I become aware of how much of a technical masterpiece it is. If you have not seen Empire by now, please do yourself a favor and stay in this weekend to treat yourself to it. It is an amazing experience.
Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back is the fifth installment of the Star Wars saga, and is the story of Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill) being trained as a Jedi Knight by Yoda (Frank Oz) while Han Solo (Harrison Ford) and Princess Leia (Carrie Fisher) are on the run from the Galactic Empire. This film is not only a great film, but it is a lesson in great storytelling. There is humor in the movie, but there are no gags. There is a love story, but rather than show makeout scenes and sex, Han and Leias' relationship is flirtatious and implied. I love how their relationship unfolds, too, because for a majority of the film, Han keeps Leia out of danger flying her throughout the galaxy. He does everything he can to keep her safe. They endure endless peril together, and fall in love. In the end, however, even Hans' willingness to take care of Leia is not enough, and the two characters are parted at a time when they need each other the most. Speaking of which, and I cannot emphasize this enough, nothing good happens to the protagonists in this film. At all. Yes, Han and Leia end up together, but only just before Han gets frozen in carbonite and taken to Jabba the Hutt by Boba Fett (Temuera Morrison). This film is quite depressing to experience but,because of the story and the way the relationships evolve between the characters, this film is a cinematic gem.
As masterful as this film is, there are a few story points and plot issues that I must address. Towards the beginning of the movie, Han Solo says that they ran into a bounty hunter on Ord Mantell that changed his mind on whether or not he was going to stay with the Rebellion. When exactly did this happen??? Also, after the evacuation of the rebel base on Hoth, Luke tells R2-D2 (Kenny Baker) that they are going to Dagobah instead of regrouping with Han and Leia. The problem is that he does not tell them. He just leaves without saying goodbye. Dick move, Skywalker. Also, how exactly does Dagobah feel familiar to Luke??? Also, how did Vader know Skywalkers' first name was Luke??? It is not as if he was present at his birth. That is like Lando inexplicably knowing Leia was a princess at the end of the movie. When did he find that out??? When they met, he did not even know her name! Another thing that bothers me about the film has to do with continuity. After, Han Solo hides the Millenium Falcon on the back of a Star Destroyer, Leia shuts down C-3PO (Anthony Daniels) because he will not stop talking. Yet, soon after it is revealed that they are being tracked by Boba Fett, he is inexplicably activated again even though nobody turned him back on. Even extremely good directors make errors.
Even with these problems, Empire is still regarded as the best of the original trilogy. I have always looked at this film as a character-driven drama more than a science-fiction film. The relationships between the characters are developed more, and the stakes are continuously raised throughout the film.
One of the newcomers to the returning cast is Billy Dee Williams as Lando Calrissian. What makes Lando so interesting and fun is the fact that you are not too sure about him when you first meet him. You get the feeling that, because he is friends with Han, he is a good guy, but the way he carries himself makes you feel uneasy. This just makes his betrayal all the more heartbreaking. It also makes his redemption that much more rewarding. When Lando realizes what he has done to his friends and goes back on his deal with Darth Vader, it is a heroic moment that will have you cheering. Williams shines in this role. He brings a beautiful balance of suaveness and swagger to the character. Also, when you are playing a character like this, it helps if you are good looking. Williams has dashing good looks which are only emphasized with that flowing cape of his.
In what is probably the most memorable role of the film, Frank Oz plays Yoda. I love the fact that Yoda is testing Luke during their initial meeting by acting goofy and weird. After which, Yoda concludes, "The boy has no patience" and the true Yoda is revealed. Also, the lessons that Yoda teaches Luke resonate deeply because they are lessons that every person should learn in life. It is also quite emotional to know that Yoda was present at Lukes' birth. Oz gives a powerful performance, and quite honestly has the best dialog in the film. The way Yoda moves and utters his lines are part of what makes you believe in the character. If this character had not worked, the whole film would have fallen apart.
Irvin Kershner is the director of Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back. This film is vast and broad, spanning two or three different worlds, and the sets are magnificent to look at. There are also some breathtaking space battles in the film. These scenes are spectacular to watch, but there is also emotion behind the effects because each battle puts our heroes in danger. There is never action for the sake of action. The cinematography in the Hoth battle is particularly beautiful. I also love what Kershner does with the friendship between Han and Luke in this film. Han Solo is not the warmest of men, but we see through a series of events that Han does care about Luke and vice-versa. These scenes are not overly emotional, but they still carry emotional weight. It would be remiss if I did not mention the climactic lightsaber duel between Darth Vader and Luke Skywalker. I love the fact that the duel takes place in three different "stages" if you will, and that each "stage" is considerably more intense than the previous one. The cinematography in the carbon freezing chamber alone will leave you awestruck. Of course, the reveal of Lukes' true parentage is one of the most bone-chilling moments in all of cinema. This is coupled by one of the best cliffhangers in all of cinema. I remember eight years ago when Irvin Kershner died, and I just happened to be watching Empire when I read the news that day. It broke my heart, and it still does, because he gave us the greatest film in the Star Wars saga.
It took me quite a while to appreciate The Empire Strikes Back as the cinematic landmark it truly is. I have always enjoyed the film, but only in recent years did I become aware of how much of a technical masterpiece it is. If you have not seen Empire by now, please do yourself a favor and stay in this weekend to treat yourself to it. It is an amazing experience.
Wednesday, April 12, 2017
One Film Trilogy To Bind Them: Part III
The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies is the culmination of Peter Jacksons' Middle Earth saga. Everything pays off, and is wrapped up in a beautiful way. The amount of respect and care that Jackson has for Tolkiens' world is completely evident in this final chapter of the Hobbit film series.
The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies is the final installment of the Hobbit film trilogy, and is the story of Bilbo Baggins (Martin Freeman) and the company of dwarves, and their involvement in a war over the Lonely Mountain. While this film stands perfectly well on its own, it also brings the Middle Earth saga full circle with certain character developments and plot points. I love that we see Thorin Oakenshield (Richard Armitage) fully succumb to the sickness of Erebors' treasure, and that it is only through the help of his friends and Bilbo that he realizes his wrongdoings and is redeemed in the end. I also love the attack on Dol Guldur by the White Council for several reasons. Yes, the physical battle is intense and spectacular, but there are also a couple of key character moments in this scene. We see the dark side of Lady Galadriel (Cate Blanchett) that is completely out of control, and this serves as a prelude to her scene in The Fellowship of the Ring. We can also assume from this scene that the Necromancers' display of power is ultimately what seduces Saruman (Christopher Lee) to the dark side. After all, his last words are, "Leave Sauron to me". It seems only natural that he would follow Sauron to Mordor, and ultimately become his puppet. I also like that we see how Gandalf (Ian McKellen) gets the staff that he uses in The Lord of the Rings films, and that Thorin gives Bilbo his mythril vest. However, for everything that this film does right, it also does several things wrong. There is a sequence in the film where we see Gandalf randomly riding a horse to Erebor. The fact that he is on his way to Erebor does not bother me, but the fact that he is riding a horse does. How in the world did he come to acquire this horse?? This may sound like I am nitpicking, but I would have liked to at least seen him summon the horse by whistling or something. I also would have liked to see the news spread in a more elaborate way about the death of Smaug and the dwarves of Erebor seeking to reclaim it. It just feels like everybody randomly shows up and declares their intentions. Also, during the climactic war, Alfrid (Ryan Gage) is running and hiding, and keeping away from any violence. Then, seemingly out of nowhere, he is seen being catapulted into the mouth of a troll. Granted, this is awesome, but I would have liked to have seen how he wound up in the catapult in the first place. Speaking of the war, it does not feel like there is a clear end to everything. Yes, Azog is killed, but does that automatically mean that the war is over??? It all seems terribly anti-climactic. Despite all the problems with the plot, this final Hobbit film is action-packed and overwhelmingly emotional.
Peter Jackson is the director of The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies. From a storytelling perspective, I love the way Jackson handles the character arc of Thorin Oakenshield. Oakenshield slips far into the dark sickness of the mountain, and his redemption is carefully done and handled with grace. I also like the way Kilis' (Aidan Turner) death is handled. Tauriel (Evangeline Lilly) watches with horror as he killed and, even though no words are spoken, you can see the love they have for each other in their eyes. Naturally, the climactic war sequences are the highlight of the film. The war continuously gets more intense, and each shot is awe-inspiring to behold. The ending of the film is also quite well done, and seeing Bilbo and Gandalf part ways is enough to bring tears to your eyes. This film is a breathtaking finale to the Middle Earth saga, and Jackson has firmly cemented himself as one of the best filmmakers of the modern era.
The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies serves as an epic conclusion to the Hobbit film trilogy, and also beautifully leads into the Lord of the Rings films. J.R.R. Tolkien would be truly proud of what Peter Jackson has done. If you enjoyed the first two Hobbit films, you will no doubt enjoy this exciting final chapter.
The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies is the final installment of the Hobbit film trilogy, and is the story of Bilbo Baggins (Martin Freeman) and the company of dwarves, and their involvement in a war over the Lonely Mountain. While this film stands perfectly well on its own, it also brings the Middle Earth saga full circle with certain character developments and plot points. I love that we see Thorin Oakenshield (Richard Armitage) fully succumb to the sickness of Erebors' treasure, and that it is only through the help of his friends and Bilbo that he realizes his wrongdoings and is redeemed in the end. I also love the attack on Dol Guldur by the White Council for several reasons. Yes, the physical battle is intense and spectacular, but there are also a couple of key character moments in this scene. We see the dark side of Lady Galadriel (Cate Blanchett) that is completely out of control, and this serves as a prelude to her scene in The Fellowship of the Ring. We can also assume from this scene that the Necromancers' display of power is ultimately what seduces Saruman (Christopher Lee) to the dark side. After all, his last words are, "Leave Sauron to me". It seems only natural that he would follow Sauron to Mordor, and ultimately become his puppet. I also like that we see how Gandalf (Ian McKellen) gets the staff that he uses in The Lord of the Rings films, and that Thorin gives Bilbo his mythril vest. However, for everything that this film does right, it also does several things wrong. There is a sequence in the film where we see Gandalf randomly riding a horse to Erebor. The fact that he is on his way to Erebor does not bother me, but the fact that he is riding a horse does. How in the world did he come to acquire this horse?? This may sound like I am nitpicking, but I would have liked to at least seen him summon the horse by whistling or something. I also would have liked to see the news spread in a more elaborate way about the death of Smaug and the dwarves of Erebor seeking to reclaim it. It just feels like everybody randomly shows up and declares their intentions. Also, during the climactic war, Alfrid (Ryan Gage) is running and hiding, and keeping away from any violence. Then, seemingly out of nowhere, he is seen being catapulted into the mouth of a troll. Granted, this is awesome, but I would have liked to have seen how he wound up in the catapult in the first place. Speaking of the war, it does not feel like there is a clear end to everything. Yes, Azog is killed, but does that automatically mean that the war is over??? It all seems terribly anti-climactic. Despite all the problems with the plot, this final Hobbit film is action-packed and overwhelmingly emotional.
Peter Jackson is the director of The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies. From a storytelling perspective, I love the way Jackson handles the character arc of Thorin Oakenshield. Oakenshield slips far into the dark sickness of the mountain, and his redemption is carefully done and handled with grace. I also like the way Kilis' (Aidan Turner) death is handled. Tauriel (Evangeline Lilly) watches with horror as he killed and, even though no words are spoken, you can see the love they have for each other in their eyes. Naturally, the climactic war sequences are the highlight of the film. The war continuously gets more intense, and each shot is awe-inspiring to behold. The ending of the film is also quite well done, and seeing Bilbo and Gandalf part ways is enough to bring tears to your eyes. This film is a breathtaking finale to the Middle Earth saga, and Jackson has firmly cemented himself as one of the best filmmakers of the modern era.
The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies serves as an epic conclusion to the Hobbit film trilogy, and also beautifully leads into the Lord of the Rings films. J.R.R. Tolkien would be truly proud of what Peter Jackson has done. If you enjoyed the first two Hobbit films, you will no doubt enjoy this exciting final chapter.
Wednesday, March 29, 2017
Bad Times In The Great White North
I always love it when filmmakers I admire and respect go outside their comfort zone and try new things. The movie Tusk is a great example of that. I remember seeing this film in theaters, and being in complete awe of the fact that Kevin Smith, who is mostly known for doing raunchy comedies, had crafted a solid horror flick.
Tusk is the story of a podcaster who mysteriously goes missing in Manitoba, Canada. This film reminds me of the horror movies from the 1970's and 80's. There is so much tension, and you are genuinely creeped out by the films' antagonist so much that you will be looking over your shoulder to see if he is there. I also love that, right off the bat, we are not only introduced to Wallace Bryton (Justin Long) and Teddy Craft (Haley Joel Osment), but we also see what they do for a living and how quirky their sense of humor is. That quirkiness is echoed by the horrors that Wallace endures throughout the film. I also enjoy the fact that there is very little music in the film, and that when you do hear it, it is more ambient noise than actual music. This adds to the genuine fear that you feel while watching this film.
While Kevin Smith does show that he can make a solid horror film, there are a few problems I have with the film. At one point in the film, Wallace calls his girlfriend Ally Leon (Genesis Rodriguez) and Teddy from inside Howard Howes' home to let them know what has happened to him. Later, we see Ally and Teddy looking for Wallace on the side of the road with a flashlight. This seems silly to me. It is clear that Wallace is trapped in Howes' home, so why would he be on the side of the road?? Also, some of the flashback sequences have different dialogue from when they actually happened in the film. I am sorry, but this is Continuity 101 that you learn in film school!! I also feel that Wallace turns "Full Walrus" a tad too quickly for my taste. I feel that there needed to be more character development for this to be believable. Other than these issues, Kevin Smith shows that he knows how to breathe new life into a genre that has gotten far too generic.
Michael Parks is truly disturbing as Howard Howe. Howe is such a layered character, and it is because of these layers that you believe he has gone completely insane. At first, it seems like Howe is out to punish people for things that they take for granted. However, we later learn that when he was rescued by the walrus, it had a profound effect on him and he needs that character back in his life no matter what the stakes are. Parks' greatest moments are in his two monologue scenes. The way he delivers his lines keeps you glued to the screen because you are just not sure whether he is going to pounce on Wallace mid-speech or just keep talking. Parks is absolutely horrifying, and will have you looking over your shoulder throughout the film.
Justin Long plays Wallace Bryton. Bryton represents the kind of person who has let success go their head, which makes what happens to him all the more satisfying. Bryton loves being successful, and even shows contempt for the person he once was. The scene where Bryton is bragging about his success to Ally is where you realize that you hate this character not only because of the fresh dialogue, but because of the way Justin Long plays the character. He is brilliant in the role, and also displays wonderful comedic chops at the expense of Canada.
Haley Joel Osment and Genesis Rodriguez play Teddy Craft and Ally Leon, respectively. Under typical circumstances, these would be the characters that attempt to find out what happened to the main character, and see if he is still alive. However, Kevin Smith wrote a beautiful angle between these characters that adds something to, not only their relationship, but their relationship with Wallace as well. The banter between Osment and Rodriguez is genuine and hilarious, and you ultimately see how the relationship their characters have is affected by what happens to Wallace. These are good performances, particularly by Osment, that help carry the film.
Kevin Smith is the director of Tusk. As I mentioned before, this film hearkens back to the glory days of horror movies. I have been openly critical about the current generation of horror films because I feel that they rely to heavily on gore and jump scares. There is gore, and there are jump scares in this film, but it is used sparingly and in places that you would not expect, much like the horror films of old. I also love that Smith uses classical music in the torture scenes. Howe is someone who sees what he is doing as art, and having beautiful music play in the background adds something to both his character and the film as a whole. Also, I am sick and twisted and I find something glorious about body torture in horror films. I personally find that classical music adds to the glorification of blood splattering all over the walls. One of the other issues I have with this film has to do with the final sequence of the film. The issue I have with it has to do with how film fans interpret the movie. The final scene takes place at an exotic animal shelter where Wallace is staying. If you look at this film as a horror movie, which is the way I look at it, this sequence feels entirely out of place and it does not match the tone of the rest of the film. However, if you look at this film as a dark comedy, this sequence will make you chuckle. It is all in how you interpret the movie.
It is nice to see Kevin Smith continually think outside the box, and make films that are outside of his comfort zone. I think horror filmmakers today could learn much from watching this film. If you are in the mood for something fresh and original from one of the industrys' top independent directors, look no further than Tusk.
While Kevin Smith does show that he can make a solid horror film, there are a few problems I have with the film. At one point in the film, Wallace calls his girlfriend Ally Leon (Genesis Rodriguez) and Teddy from inside Howard Howes' home to let them know what has happened to him. Later, we see Ally and Teddy looking for Wallace on the side of the road with a flashlight. This seems silly to me. It is clear that Wallace is trapped in Howes' home, so why would he be on the side of the road?? Also, some of the flashback sequences have different dialogue from when they actually happened in the film. I am sorry, but this is Continuity 101 that you learn in film school!! I also feel that Wallace turns "Full Walrus" a tad too quickly for my taste. I feel that there needed to be more character development for this to be believable. Other than these issues, Kevin Smith shows that he knows how to breathe new life into a genre that has gotten far too generic.
Michael Parks is truly disturbing as Howard Howe. Howe is such a layered character, and it is because of these layers that you believe he has gone completely insane. At first, it seems like Howe is out to punish people for things that they take for granted. However, we later learn that when he was rescued by the walrus, it had a profound effect on him and he needs that character back in his life no matter what the stakes are. Parks' greatest moments are in his two monologue scenes. The way he delivers his lines keeps you glued to the screen because you are just not sure whether he is going to pounce on Wallace mid-speech or just keep talking. Parks is absolutely horrifying, and will have you looking over your shoulder throughout the film.
Justin Long plays Wallace Bryton. Bryton represents the kind of person who has let success go their head, which makes what happens to him all the more satisfying. Bryton loves being successful, and even shows contempt for the person he once was. The scene where Bryton is bragging about his success to Ally is where you realize that you hate this character not only because of the fresh dialogue, but because of the way Justin Long plays the character. He is brilliant in the role, and also displays wonderful comedic chops at the expense of Canada.
Haley Joel Osment and Genesis Rodriguez play Teddy Craft and Ally Leon, respectively. Under typical circumstances, these would be the characters that attempt to find out what happened to the main character, and see if he is still alive. However, Kevin Smith wrote a beautiful angle between these characters that adds something to, not only their relationship, but their relationship with Wallace as well. The banter between Osment and Rodriguez is genuine and hilarious, and you ultimately see how the relationship their characters have is affected by what happens to Wallace. These are good performances, particularly by Osment, that help carry the film.
Kevin Smith is the director of Tusk. As I mentioned before, this film hearkens back to the glory days of horror movies. I have been openly critical about the current generation of horror films because I feel that they rely to heavily on gore and jump scares. There is gore, and there are jump scares in this film, but it is used sparingly and in places that you would not expect, much like the horror films of old. I also love that Smith uses classical music in the torture scenes. Howe is someone who sees what he is doing as art, and having beautiful music play in the background adds something to both his character and the film as a whole. Also, I am sick and twisted and I find something glorious about body torture in horror films. I personally find that classical music adds to the glorification of blood splattering all over the walls. One of the other issues I have with this film has to do with the final sequence of the film. The issue I have with it has to do with how film fans interpret the movie. The final scene takes place at an exotic animal shelter where Wallace is staying. If you look at this film as a horror movie, which is the way I look at it, this sequence feels entirely out of place and it does not match the tone of the rest of the film. However, if you look at this film as a dark comedy, this sequence will make you chuckle. It is all in how you interpret the movie.
It is nice to see Kevin Smith continually think outside the box, and make films that are outside of his comfort zone. I think horror filmmakers today could learn much from watching this film. If you are in the mood for something fresh and original from one of the industrys' top independent directors, look no further than Tusk.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)